pandatrash (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
pandatrash) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
randangonpa2017-12-21 02:34 pm
pandatrash) wrote in randangonpa2017-12-21 02:34 pm
Day 6 - Final discussion before the second execution
[This morning, a video of Tycoon auto-plays on everyone's tablets. He is in a dimly lit room, and seems to be eating pudding out of a bicycle horn...? Whatever, the raccoons are weird.]
Today’s the day! Are you pumped up? Psyched out? Pissed off? Done in? Hehehehe!
Everybody better vote today for who you want to be PUNISHED! If you don't vote by the time the timer reaches zero, your vote will be randomized! Just like it now says in the rules!
I, Tycoon (only Tycoon), will still answer one question per person if you haven’t cashed yours in yet! Rule clarifications are free, by the way! Also, quit freaking out about the people who are off crying in their rooms or whatever! You already have all the alibis you need to solve the mystery!
((Navigation
Recyclr
Day 5 Q&A with Tycoon
Today's Q&A with Tycoon
Vote! It says midnight Friday, but it's technically midnight Saturday. 11:59 Friday, WHATEVER.))
Today’s the day! Are you pumped up? Psyched out? Pissed off? Done in? Hehehehe!
Everybody better vote today for who you want to be PUNISHED! If you don't vote by the time the timer reaches zero, your vote will be randomized! Just like it now says in the rules!
I, Tycoon (only Tycoon), will still answer one question per person if you haven’t cashed yours in yet! Rule clarifications are free, by the way! Also, quit freaking out about the people who are off crying in their rooms or whatever! You already have all the alibis you need to solve the mystery!
((Navigation
Recyclr
Day 5 Q&A with Tycoon
Today's Q&A with Tycoon
Vote! It says midnight Friday, but it's technically midnight Saturday. 11:59 Friday, WHATEVER.))
no subject
And naturally I will deny his reasoning, because even during his presentation of his reasoning, he admitted that it wasn't much to go on and it was just something that made sense when nothing else managed to. In other words: it's an uncertain reasoning.
So treating it like definitive proof is your folly, not his.